Object Pascal is not the predecessor to Delphi. So, this is probably why its still being used. Yet, there are differences that may be decisive for their relative applicability for different problems. [32], RAD Studio is both the formal name for the IDE and a product suite that contains both Delphi and C++Builder. Go's compilation speed is more than PR. Yet everything remains possible. I used C++Builder at a previous job. And so, much like the mainframes running in the data centers of banks/insurance/etc companies, delphi is probably still driving a fair number of business logic applications. Also, Delphi didn't have a completely "Visual Programming" paradigm, if you mean it in the sense of some of those experimental tools that claim that all programming can be done visually/graphically, simply by drawing diagrams, dragging and dropping components onto a window, connecting them visually, etc. I’ve been in a team of 3 developers that out programmed a corporate wide application by having it up and running in a few months compared to another team I know of over 30 Java developers who 18 months later still had not produced their application. It's the libraries and programming language skills that matter. The main code base is handled by one developer. > Modern languages don't particularly encourage or discourage that style of programming, I agree...this is not forced on us by modern languages, it is current culture/fashion. Modern languages don't particularly encourage or discourage that style of programming. Those languages have standard libraries with rather minimalist APIs, so I don't see the bloat there. Don't learn Qt if you want to find clients. At the time of release its features were quite innovative, and very accessible to the Turbo Pascal programmers (like me!) I was in deep at that point. Delphi Prism is all about being a full featured .NET development language and "forward compatibility." Man that was a great experience. Which leaves it relegated to hobby developers and 1 man software vendors. And my reaction was "Nope. Well I certinanly hope developers can see delphi's potental. For dedicated string types Delphi handles memory management without programmer intervention. Delphi uses the Pascal-based programming language Object Pascal introduced by Borland. Out of nostalgia I checked out Lazarus and I'm glad it has a somewhat thriving community. For future large scale projects. Reimplementing a delphi application of a hundred thousand lines is probably a thousand man year project with a "modern" web stack. PeopleCode/Tools is more equivalent to ABAP offered by SAP, it's heavily tied to the Peoplesoft environment, and has no real comparison to Delphi. 3. The integration of reporting components made generating nice paper printouts a snap too. Not so when compared with most languages with module systems. Because it cannot just die yet! Nope.". Just goes to show, here is a link: http://www.embarcadero.com/products/delphi, From 1997: "Borland International and Microsoft have settled a Borland-launched lawsuit that started on May 7, 1997, in Santa Clara County, CA. The native binaries nature of Delphi has meant there is no such equivalent (that I'm aware of), although I'm considering leveraging Nuget's packaging format and tools for BPLs. True, but since if one has a job working for an enterprise like that makes me want to kill myself in a hurry I consider that a feature, not a bug. Delphi was designed by the same architect that later designed .NEt. I use CB2007. I can't comment on the web capabilities of Delphi specifically, I'm thinking your standard boring enterprisey CRUD app with various calculations/business logic/reports, etc....thousands of new apps of these kind are written every year, nowadays typically with a web front end (regardless if that's really necessary, all things considered). Enbrighten Cafe Lights Warranty, How Far Is Jersey From The Coast Of France, Manchester United Stats 2018/19, Little Girl Synonyms, Soundhound Identify Song, How Far Is Jersey From The Coast Of France, Rope Swings For Trees, Campbell High School Soccer, Ellan Vannin The Spinners, How To Cut Hole For Toilet Flange, " /> Object Pascal is not the predecessor to Delphi. So, this is probably why its still being used. Yet, there are differences that may be decisive for their relative applicability for different problems. [32], RAD Studio is both the formal name for the IDE and a product suite that contains both Delphi and C++Builder. Go's compilation speed is more than PR. Yet everything remains possible. I used C++Builder at a previous job. And so, much like the mainframes running in the data centers of banks/insurance/etc companies, delphi is probably still driving a fair number of business logic applications. Also, Delphi didn't have a completely "Visual Programming" paradigm, if you mean it in the sense of some of those experimental tools that claim that all programming can be done visually/graphically, simply by drawing diagrams, dragging and dropping components onto a window, connecting them visually, etc. I’ve been in a team of 3 developers that out programmed a corporate wide application by having it up and running in a few months compared to another team I know of over 30 Java developers who 18 months later still had not produced their application. It's the libraries and programming language skills that matter. The main code base is handled by one developer. > Modern languages don't particularly encourage or discourage that style of programming, I agree...this is not forced on us by modern languages, it is current culture/fashion. Modern languages don't particularly encourage or discourage that style of programming. Those languages have standard libraries with rather minimalist APIs, so I don't see the bloat there. Don't learn Qt if you want to find clients. At the time of release its features were quite innovative, and very accessible to the Turbo Pascal programmers (like me!) I was in deep at that point. Delphi Prism is all about being a full featured .NET development language and "forward compatibility." Man that was a great experience. Which leaves it relegated to hobby developers and 1 man software vendors. And my reaction was "Nope. Well I certinanly hope developers can see delphi's potental. For dedicated string types Delphi handles memory management without programmer intervention. Delphi uses the Pascal-based programming language Object Pascal introduced by Borland. Out of nostalgia I checked out Lazarus and I'm glad it has a somewhat thriving community. For future large scale projects. Reimplementing a delphi application of a hundred thousand lines is probably a thousand man year project with a "modern" web stack. PeopleCode/Tools is more equivalent to ABAP offered by SAP, it's heavily tied to the Peoplesoft environment, and has no real comparison to Delphi. 3. The integration of reporting components made generating nice paper printouts a snap too. Not so when compared with most languages with module systems. Because it cannot just die yet! Nope.". Just goes to show, here is a link: http://www.embarcadero.com/products/delphi, From 1997: "Borland International and Microsoft have settled a Borland-launched lawsuit that started on May 7, 1997, in Santa Clara County, CA. The native binaries nature of Delphi has meant there is no such equivalent (that I'm aware of), although I'm considering leveraging Nuget's packaging format and tools for BPLs. True, but since if one has a job working for an enterprise like that makes me want to kill myself in a hurry I consider that a feature, not a bug. Delphi was designed by the same architect that later designed .NEt. I use CB2007. I can't comment on the web capabilities of Delphi specifically, I'm thinking your standard boring enterprisey CRUD app with various calculations/business logic/reports, etc....thousands of new apps of these kind are written every year, nowadays typically with a web front end (regardless if that's really necessary, all things considered). Enbrighten Cafe Lights Warranty, How Far Is Jersey From The Coast Of France, Manchester United Stats 2018/19, Little Girl Synonyms, Soundhound Identify Song, How Far Is Jersey From The Coast Of France, Rope Swings For Trees, Campbell High School Soccer, Ellan Vannin The Spinners, How To Cut Hole For Toilet Flange, " /> Object Pascal is not the predecessor to Delphi. So, this is probably why its still being used. Yet, there are differences that may be decisive for their relative applicability for different problems. [32], RAD Studio is both the formal name for the IDE and a product suite that contains both Delphi and C++Builder. Go's compilation speed is more than PR. Yet everything remains possible. I used C++Builder at a previous job. And so, much like the mainframes running in the data centers of banks/insurance/etc companies, delphi is probably still driving a fair number of business logic applications. Also, Delphi didn't have a completely "Visual Programming" paradigm, if you mean it in the sense of some of those experimental tools that claim that all programming can be done visually/graphically, simply by drawing diagrams, dragging and dropping components onto a window, connecting them visually, etc. I’ve been in a team of 3 developers that out programmed a corporate wide application by having it up and running in a few months compared to another team I know of over 30 Java developers who 18 months later still had not produced their application. It's the libraries and programming language skills that matter. The main code base is handled by one developer. > Modern languages don't particularly encourage or discourage that style of programming, I agree...this is not forced on us by modern languages, it is current culture/fashion. Modern languages don't particularly encourage or discourage that style of programming. Those languages have standard libraries with rather minimalist APIs, so I don't see the bloat there. Don't learn Qt if you want to find clients. At the time of release its features were quite innovative, and very accessible to the Turbo Pascal programmers (like me!) I was in deep at that point. Delphi Prism is all about being a full featured .NET development language and "forward compatibility." Man that was a great experience. Which leaves it relegated to hobby developers and 1 man software vendors. And my reaction was "Nope. Well I certinanly hope developers can see delphi's potental. For dedicated string types Delphi handles memory management without programmer intervention. Delphi uses the Pascal-based programming language Object Pascal introduced by Borland. Out of nostalgia I checked out Lazarus and I'm glad it has a somewhat thriving community. For future large scale projects. Reimplementing a delphi application of a hundred thousand lines is probably a thousand man year project with a "modern" web stack. PeopleCode/Tools is more equivalent to ABAP offered by SAP, it's heavily tied to the Peoplesoft environment, and has no real comparison to Delphi. 3. The integration of reporting components made generating nice paper printouts a snap too. Not so when compared with most languages with module systems. Because it cannot just die yet! Nope.". Just goes to show, here is a link: http://www.embarcadero.com/products/delphi, From 1997: "Borland International and Microsoft have settled a Borland-launched lawsuit that started on May 7, 1997, in Santa Clara County, CA. The native binaries nature of Delphi has meant there is no such equivalent (that I'm aware of), although I'm considering leveraging Nuget's packaging format and tools for BPLs. True, but since if one has a job working for an enterprise like that makes me want to kill myself in a hurry I consider that a feature, not a bug. Delphi was designed by the same architect that later designed .NEt. I use CB2007. I can't comment on the web capabilities of Delphi specifically, I'm thinking your standard boring enterprisey CRUD app with various calculations/business logic/reports, etc....thousands of new apps of these kind are written every year, nowadays typically with a web front end (regardless if that's really necessary, all things considered). Enbrighten Cafe Lights Warranty, How Far Is Jersey From The Coast Of France, Manchester United Stats 2018/19, Little Girl Synonyms, Soundhound Identify Song, How Far Is Jersey From The Coast Of France, Rope Swings For Trees, Campbell High School Soccer, Ellan Vannin The Spinners, How To Cut Hole For Toilet Flange, " />

is delphi still used

At / by / In / Comments are off for this post

Yes, I used the name Borland loosely. Log In Sign Up. ), I'm assuming you meant the last paragraph of your comment in a sarcastic way :). I forgot to mention in my parent comment that Delphi also generated the stubs/skeletons for the event-handling procedures. for leaving Borland for Microsoft. Lead to some bad habits though - e.g. Mathematica had details and applications for each function, while Delphi/BP had a well written explanation of what the function would do and how to use it. That said, in the late 1990s/early 2000s, I was actually using Delphi for headless backend apps. At least that is my feeling from job posts here in Germany. Easy enough for a kid to do stuff with it. The lead architect of the VCL went-on to work for Microsoft on .Net and most of the venerable (and still working, if not actively maintained) Winforms API is really reminiscent of the VCL, albeit corrupted by the win32 API leaking through. I could manage with their help pages and examples quite well. They can be resurrected if forgotten, and can be recorded (by increasingly better means) so that they won’t be overlooked. I had already tried different languages by that time. This is why kids these days jump into web development, they aren't aware how good tooling we already had back then. The difference is that a object lives on the stack and a class lives on the heap. Would you use it for a web-based app? I've worked on some projects of that type earlier. Embarcadero Delphi 10.4.1 Sydney Splash Screen. Why debug when you can trial & error 10 solutions per minute (on a weak box)? ... :-). It was that .EXE.. Delphi and its C++ counterpart, C++Builder, are interoperable and jointly sold under the name RAD Studio. Coincidentally I interned at Borland France during my marketing years ten years ago and developers were really passionate about Delphi. We liked Delphi for its native compile and unencumbered executable. It's also designed to compile fast and to native code. It should be dead, but it's not. Delphi has communities on the web, where also its employees actively participate. It is a rapid application development used to develop applications ranging from database solutions to mobile applications and is used on Windows as well as Linux. I never liked C, because I already knew a few Turbo Pascal versions before getting to learn C. So the language was always meh for me, but then Borland blew it up with their schizophrenics moves and allowed C and C++ usage to grow in the PC world. My first delphi program was a reimplementation of a 6 month long (4 programmer) access database/vb application. But in an afternoon with VB6, I could bang out a good first prototype for SO many projects that in many cases, ended up being "good enough" that we never needed to go back and re-do it "properly" in VC6. Awesome ... appreciate your perspective. I spent the first years of my non-school life developing things in Delphi, including CGI binaries in the end. Are enterprises using C++? Yes yes, they are not 'high' if you are a fortune 1000, however, they are high compared to what everyone is used to now. http://screamingduck.com/Article.php?ArticleID=43&Show=ABCE. It took years to Microsoft to get the web right (as everyone who used Visual Studio and .NET before MVC could tell you), it's no wonder it was difficult for a company like Borland to transition. The closest thing I can compare it to is going from java/tomcat to rails; that feeling of getting, I tried building an app in MFC after programming in Delphi/Borland C++ Builder. Was once in a similar situation myself. Not only was that a convenience, it helped with learning the tool and Windows GUI programming too. I see a single job posted on craigslist every 6 months in city with 50 daily job postings. Delphi gets you pixel-perfect interfaces that work on a 486 with windows 95 right up to todays windows 8 (there is a version of delphi that would get you 3.1 support as well). Delphi isolates your user interface elements into the .DFM file. The Enterprise and Architect editions of RAD Studio currently include Aqua Data Studio and Ext JS.[33]. At this symposium one of the talks was on dependency injection. Unlike managed environments such as .Net or Java, reusing well-known open source components is as simple as adding an assembly or a JAR to your project (yes, I acknowledge that in the past this has had its own challenges, but I think in the .Net world at least Nuget has largely conquered this). Re #1, Castalia is very slow fews years ago I tried, it's the ModelMaker Code Explorer that adds a lot of productivity to the IDE, including refactoring, and so on. Technologies are forever." So, this is probably why its still being used. For example, you may test to see whether a graphical component (normally called 'Sender') is a TButton, or TList or whatever. I always gravitated to it because it was a fantastic painless (mostly) wrapper for the beastly win32 API. This is why I call it PR, because most Go presentations tend to ignore the world outside C and C++. Delphi is a high level language supporting object-oriented design. For example, I just started reading Coding in Delphi (. For the macromolecular electrostatics modeling software package, see, Screenshot of Delphi 10.4, with the visual form editor being used to create an application, "Installation Notes - Operating System Requirements", "Performance Comparison from Delphi 2010 to XE6 (Part 2)", "Discussion on Hacker News about Delphi being alive", "Recollections About the Development of Pascal", "List of Delphi language features and version in which they were introduced/deprecated", "What's New in Delphi and C++Builder 2009", "What's New in Delphi and C++Builder 2010", "What's New in Delphi and C++Builder XE2", "What's New in Delphi and C++Builder XE3", "What's New in Delphi and C++Builder XE4", "What's New in Delphi and C++Builder XE5", "What's New in Delphi and C++Builder XE6", "What's New in Delphi and C++Builder XE7", "What's New in Delphi and C++Builder XE8", "RAD Studio November 2020 Roadmap PM Commentary", "RAD Studio Product Editions RAD Studio Product Editions RAD Studio is available in 3 editions – Professional, Enterprise and Architect. Close. And super fast. I totally undestand Hejlsberg for doing that. It is primarily used to build applications for Windows systems but can be used to build applications for a variety of operating systems. It's not so much that Delphi's language capabilities are superior (other than the binding), I think it's that so much of the currently fashionable bloat is more likely to be skipped. I read on the net that Linux people preferred C/gcc and its toolchain ( me too :), that may be why Kylix didn't get popular. This is not to say Delphi is archaic by any means, and those who have used Delphi in the past will probably continue to use Delphi until the end, simply because it is so resilient and future-proof. Delphi Forums remains active as of 2020. Object Pascal is not the predecessor to Delphi, > Object Pascal is not the predecessor to Delphi. So, this is probably why its still being used. Yet, there are differences that may be decisive for their relative applicability for different problems. [32], RAD Studio is both the formal name for the IDE and a product suite that contains both Delphi and C++Builder. Go's compilation speed is more than PR. Yet everything remains possible. I used C++Builder at a previous job. And so, much like the mainframes running in the data centers of banks/insurance/etc companies, delphi is probably still driving a fair number of business logic applications. Also, Delphi didn't have a completely "Visual Programming" paradigm, if you mean it in the sense of some of those experimental tools that claim that all programming can be done visually/graphically, simply by drawing diagrams, dragging and dropping components onto a window, connecting them visually, etc. I’ve been in a team of 3 developers that out programmed a corporate wide application by having it up and running in a few months compared to another team I know of over 30 Java developers who 18 months later still had not produced their application. It's the libraries and programming language skills that matter. The main code base is handled by one developer. > Modern languages don't particularly encourage or discourage that style of programming, I agree...this is not forced on us by modern languages, it is current culture/fashion. Modern languages don't particularly encourage or discourage that style of programming. Those languages have standard libraries with rather minimalist APIs, so I don't see the bloat there. Don't learn Qt if you want to find clients. At the time of release its features were quite innovative, and very accessible to the Turbo Pascal programmers (like me!) I was in deep at that point. Delphi Prism is all about being a full featured .NET development language and "forward compatibility." Man that was a great experience. Which leaves it relegated to hobby developers and 1 man software vendors. And my reaction was "Nope. Well I certinanly hope developers can see delphi's potental. For dedicated string types Delphi handles memory management without programmer intervention. Delphi uses the Pascal-based programming language Object Pascal introduced by Borland. Out of nostalgia I checked out Lazarus and I'm glad it has a somewhat thriving community. For future large scale projects. Reimplementing a delphi application of a hundred thousand lines is probably a thousand man year project with a "modern" web stack. PeopleCode/Tools is more equivalent to ABAP offered by SAP, it's heavily tied to the Peoplesoft environment, and has no real comparison to Delphi. 3. The integration of reporting components made generating nice paper printouts a snap too. Not so when compared with most languages with module systems. Because it cannot just die yet! Nope.". Just goes to show, here is a link: http://www.embarcadero.com/products/delphi, From 1997: "Borland International and Microsoft have settled a Borland-launched lawsuit that started on May 7, 1997, in Santa Clara County, CA. The native binaries nature of Delphi has meant there is no such equivalent (that I'm aware of), although I'm considering leveraging Nuget's packaging format and tools for BPLs. True, but since if one has a job working for an enterprise like that makes me want to kill myself in a hurry I consider that a feature, not a bug. Delphi was designed by the same architect that later designed .NEt. I use CB2007. I can't comment on the web capabilities of Delphi specifically, I'm thinking your standard boring enterprisey CRUD app with various calculations/business logic/reports, etc....thousands of new apps of these kind are written every year, nowadays typically with a web front end (regardless if that's really necessary, all things considered).

Enbrighten Cafe Lights Warranty, How Far Is Jersey From The Coast Of France, Manchester United Stats 2018/19, Little Girl Synonyms, Soundhound Identify Song, How Far Is Jersey From The Coast Of France, Rope Swings For Trees, Campbell High School Soccer, Ellan Vannin The Spinners, How To Cut Hole For Toilet Flange,